In thinking about the Digital Divide (or the multiple divides suggested by Kelly) I consulted this reference source DigitalDivide.org and began by reading about what this organization sees as the fallacies to closing the divide. It is a really interesting list and according to the list fallacy number 5: "The key to closing the Digital Divide is investment in literacy and education." Arguing that attacking literacy may not be necessary to closing the divide. While it may not be necessary, does that mean that strategies to deal with the divide should bypass the importance of literacy (and especially now that technology skills could be considered a larger subset of what it means to be literate today?)
In terms of the 'truths' about closing the digital divide this organization seems to believe that closing the digital divide is about building a world economy and stopping terrorism. They claim it is the solution to growth in world markets.
I guess I have not thought at the digital divide on such a global level - I had been thinking about it in the State of Maine and how access and experiences might benefit all students - I guess it is time for me to think about situating these goals within the larger context to examine why I believe this is necessary and good. Reading this organizations materials is challenging the way I think about this issue.
Showing posts with label edt697. Show all posts
Showing posts with label edt697. Show all posts
Monday, December 22, 2008
Sunday, December 21, 2008
International Reading Association Standards for ELA
In thinking about the teaching and learning involved in writing I am wondering at times how to separate the skill/knowledge of writing from the larger collection of skills that fall under the umbrella of English Language Arts. Looking at the IRA website they have established these 12 standards for ELA this may be a helpful place for me to think about how the smaller skills interact with the larger set of skills.
There is also a special interest group within IRA Technology in Literacy Education with some great ideas and resources. The Resources look like a good start, but I wonder about how teachers use and implement these - a list of hotlinks is such a common place to start, and maybe works, but it seems like we need to work towards continuing to think about why we use these tools (the TPCK model).
The Research Section also looks like a good place to find more information about how the literary world approaches the ever shifting definition of literacy in the 21st century.
There is also a special interest group within IRA Technology in Literacy Education with some great ideas and resources. The Resources look like a good start, but I wonder about how teachers use and implement these - a list of hotlinks is such a common place to start, and maybe works, but it seems like we need to work towards continuing to think about why we use these tools (the TPCK model).
The Research Section also looks like a good place to find more information about how the literary world approaches the ever shifting definition of literacy in the 21st century.
Learning New Languages
Right now I am engaged in thinking about technology and literacy instruction, while at the same time continuing to perform my regular work. My regular work has recently necessisted that I learn how to use a database more effectively, and use a web creation software more effectively. I love the challenge of new problems and have been happily engaged in problem solving.
As for learning a relational database I had some basic knowledge of using filemaker, and tried to work on my own to learn Access, the software that I have as part of my work. It's been interesting and finally after a few hours of going nowhere, enlisted the help of a willing colleauge. In an hour she was able to walk though and problem solve with me in such a great manner - I could feel the new ways of thinking sinking in, and was ready to continue to play. This manner of learning (try, get help from an expert, play more, and then perform - it's cyclic) is my preference for learning and has reminded me of how I like to learn.
Learning to use Dreamweaver on the other hand I have gone to reading a manual and using online tutorials (with book support) to begin to learn these new skills. However I also have some experts waiting in the wings to help with the learning process here.
Regardless of the application I have been struck in both cases that both feel like I must learn new languages to make things work, and not only do I need to be able to program or output these languages, but I have to train my brain to think about issues in a different manner than I had previously. Although these might not be revolutionary insights, they do make me realize that learning for me needs to have social and practice applications, and needs to allow me to think internally in new ways and express this in new formats.
I wonder then about students in school transacting with new softwares and how much is shapes both their output of content and knowledge, and the internal wiring of thinking. "Hypertext and Hypermedia have signifigantly changed how we can read in digital environments and how we create paths to search for that information" (schmidt & Gurbo, 2008, p. 68). I couldn't agree more and think about this video The Machine is Us/Using Us. It is such a great video that really makes me think about how new mediums create new patterns of thinking in students (in anyone really). However understand the relationship between new media and brain/thinking patterns seems like a challenging problem to say the least. How do we begin to understand this dynamic realtionship between the form and the user and how each impacts the other (okay it feels weird to talk about impact between a human form and a non-human thing, but I do believe it is not just a one way relationship.
Measuring, describing and understand the ways we interact with computers and the shifts we make in thinking and practice is such an exciting topic.
As for learning a relational database I had some basic knowledge of using filemaker, and tried to work on my own to learn Access, the software that I have as part of my work. It's been interesting and finally after a few hours of going nowhere, enlisted the help of a willing colleauge. In an hour she was able to walk though and problem solve with me in such a great manner - I could feel the new ways of thinking sinking in, and was ready to continue to play. This manner of learning (try, get help from an expert, play more, and then perform - it's cyclic) is my preference for learning and has reminded me of how I like to learn.
Learning to use Dreamweaver on the other hand I have gone to reading a manual and using online tutorials (with book support) to begin to learn these new skills. However I also have some experts waiting in the wings to help with the learning process here.
Regardless of the application I have been struck in both cases that both feel like I must learn new languages to make things work, and not only do I need to be able to program or output these languages, but I have to train my brain to think about issues in a different manner than I had previously. Although these might not be revolutionary insights, they do make me realize that learning for me needs to have social and practice applications, and needs to allow me to think internally in new ways and express this in new formats.
I wonder then about students in school transacting with new softwares and how much is shapes both their output of content and knowledge, and the internal wiring of thinking. "Hypertext and Hypermedia have signifigantly changed how we can read in digital environments and how we create paths to search for that information" (schmidt & Gurbo, 2008, p. 68). I couldn't agree more and think about this video The Machine is Us/Using Us. It is such a great video that really makes me think about how new mediums create new patterns of thinking in students (in anyone really). However understand the relationship between new media and brain/thinking patterns seems like a challenging problem to say the least. How do we begin to understand this dynamic realtionship between the form and the user and how each impacts the other (okay it feels weird to talk about impact between a human form and a non-human thing, but I do believe it is not just a one way relationship.
Measuring, describing and understand the ways we interact with computers and the shifts we make in thinking and practice is such an exciting topic.
New Technologies and Writing Instruction
As part of my doctoral work and my interest in educational technology I have decided to spend time thinking and reading about how new technologies (and even older technologies) are impacting writing instruction and writing achievement in schools. There is a lot of learn and think about in this field and topic, and so I am beginning with reading as much as i can on the subject.
I have just begun to read Handbook of Technological Pedgogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. In reading this book I am incredibly excited to see so many great ideas connecting in a framework for understanding these issue.The TPCK Model suggests that teachers use different, overlapping sets of background knowledge to effectively plan for instruction. These areas interact in a complex and shifting manner that is context dependent. The framework is therefor NOT a blueprint for implementation, but rather a way to think about and examine practices.
"One of the most important things to understand about technologies is that particular technologies have specific affordances and constraints. Technologies are neither neutral nor unboased" (AACTE, p.5). Certainly I agree with this statement and just like any pedagogical choice the use of a particular technology needs to be considered in light of the context, student, resource, goal and more.
As a teacher and teacher educator what I am left wondering is how to help teachers build these knowledge bases in a manner which encourages the application of the knowledge, rather than a blueprint fashion. Teaching teachers to be creative seems to be the first step in instilling imagintation, inquiry and innovation in students.
I have just begun to read Handbook of Technological Pedgogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. In reading this book I am incredibly excited to see so many great ideas connecting in a framework for understanding these issue.The TPCK Model suggests that teachers use different, overlapping sets of background knowledge to effectively plan for instruction. These areas interact in a complex and shifting manner that is context dependent. The framework is therefor NOT a blueprint for implementation, but rather a way to think about and examine practices.
"One of the most important things to understand about technologies is that particular technologies have specific affordances and constraints. Technologies are neither neutral nor unboased" (AACTE, p.5). Certainly I agree with this statement and just like any pedagogical choice the use of a particular technology needs to be considered in light of the context, student, resource, goal and more.
As a teacher and teacher educator what I am left wondering is how to help teachers build these knowledge bases in a manner which encourages the application of the knowledge, rather than a blueprint fashion. Teaching teachers to be creative seems to be the first step in instilling imagintation, inquiry and innovation in students.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
