Tensions of New Literacy in Old Structures

This week E Sky-McIlvain responded to an earlier post

What is missing, from my point of view, is creativity - a literacy that we seem to be killing, even in laptop classrooms. It is interesting that the new 2.0 literacies can be just as limiting as they can be expanding. Enter the teacher/bar-setter (which can also be student peers) and the platform for creative ideas to be showcased. Are teachers afraid of that? Yes, I think they are. How many history teachers would let students immerse in Vietnam without learning about other 20th century wars? How about just immersing in "war" as a concept, with facts and documents gathered and organized and shared for emotional rather than academic messages? Confining technologies to facts and outcomes has to go if we are to reach those higher, newer, levels of use.

I could not agree more with her sentiments and found myself returning to this post as I was reading a chapter from W Kist's book New Literacies in Action. In the chapter "My Grandchildren's Time Zone" he talks about the tensions inherent in new literacy classrooms and questions if the current structure of schools can support this new kind of learning. Just as Betsy questions above, these new literacies can really begin to free teachers and students to examine ideas and content in new ways, but not if confined to old methods of assessment and understandings of being a teacher. Additionally Kist makes a wonderful point that if we embrace these new literacies and multiple forms of presentation and communication, we must question if we still revert back to text once students have had this new learning. I know as a teacher I have been guilty of this! You ask students to engage, create, explore, all those good things, and then...you ask them to write about. This return back to traditional response and print media has to be examined. I am not sure it is never appropriate, but if we always come back to the same place, have we gone anywhere.

Kist presents many tensions - the role of the teacher, the return to the same media, the time spent on projects, the presence of assessment and grading demands. These realities of how we understand school exist, and as teachers look to change the way we educate students how can we help explore and ease these tensions such that we avoid black and white answers, but instead deal with the ambiguity that is always present in education and life.